Although my treatment that removes Eohyeol the cause of all illness, it cannot be applied to some body parts. Like antibiotics, Eastern herbal medicine also moves through blood vessels, thus sometimes it cannot reach some parts. In this case, you need to apply the treatment at both the front and rear side of the point with Oriental medicine. It has shown remarkable improvement on diabetes, paralysis and chronic renal failure. As for such disease as angina pectoris, I believe it would be much better to seek help from a Western-trained physician with an adequate supply of blood. However, I am not sure if they will be cooperative.

The law that pertains to medicine in Korea exists only for some people who have vested rights in the medical industry, not for others who try to eliminate diseases by developing new technologies. In order to develop medical technologies, the government should promote competition of medical techniques and disclose the name of the person who discovered the treatment, and make the selected treatment popular. We have to apply the law of “survival of the fittest” to the medical industry. It is up to each patient whether a treatment method should be continued ? granted the right to existence ? or not. Patients have the right to choose the most suitable treatment to cure their illness and even the law should not put restrictions on this. This does not mean an absolute ability to treat diseases. It is the matter of concept.

A goal for medical treatment should be the recovery of a patient's illness, and doctors should compete to achieve that goal. Over 60% of Korean citizens who are 30 years and older have at least on health problem. But some hospitals have financial difficulties because they don't have enough patients. If doctors do their best to cure illness and their treatment work on the illness, there would be no hospital in financial ruin.